The federal Departments of Homeland Security, Defense and Justice and The Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued guidance on the implementation of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015 (CISA).  Among the four guidance documents issued by these agencies is one outlining the ways non-federal entities (which would include private employers) can share information with federal entities regarding cyber threat indicators and defensive measures taken against those threat indicators.  The guidance addresses procedures for sharing cyber threat indicator and defensive measures information under the CISA.

The CISA authorizes the sharing of “cyber threat indicators” and “defensive measures” for a “cybersecurity purpose.”  The guidance highlights the fact that the CISA attempts to strike an appropriate balance between sharing information about cyber threat indicators and defensive measures while protecting the privacy of information when it is not directly related to and necessary to identify or describe a cyber security threat.  The guidance further explains that the CISA “promotes the goal of sharing while simultaneously providing privacy protections.” Therefore, the guidance cautions non-federal entities such as private employers to carefully review information before sharing it to assure they do not inadvertently disclose information that should have been kept private.

The guidance provides an overview of the methods non-federal entities can use to report to federal agencies information about cyber threats and defensive measures. These include the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Automated Indicator Sharing (AIS) initiative, the webform on DHS’ National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, emailing DHS, and sharing information through Information Sharing and Analysis Centers or Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations.  When a non-federal entity shares information using these methods, it is afforded liability protection under the CISA, as well as other protections such as an exemption from federal antitrust laws.

When a non-federal agency reports cyber threats and defensive measures in a manner other than those outlined above, it does not receive protection from liability, but still has the other protections available under CISA like the federal antitrust exemption and protection of commercial, financial and proprietary information.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Michael R. Bertoncini Michael R. Bertoncini

Michael R. Bertoncini is a principal in the Boston, Massachusetts, office of Jackson Lewis. He is a member of the Healthcare industry group and a member of the Higher Education group.

With a background as a former Deputy General Counsel, Michael understands first-hand…

Michael R. Bertoncini is a principal in the Boston, Massachusetts, office of Jackson Lewis. He is a member of the Healthcare industry group and a member of the Higher Education group.

With a background as a former Deputy General Counsel, Michael understands first-hand the competing demands and unique challenges faced by in-house counsel. Before joining Jackson Lewis, he was responsible for all labor and employment law matters for the largest fully integrated community care hospital system in New England. Michael provides timely, practical advice that helps clients achieve their strategic goals while ensuring compliance with legal obligations.

With deep experience in a broad range of industries, Michael has a keen interest in the healthcare, higher education, museum, and arts & music sectors. He is dedicated to supporting clients in these areas, leveraging his extensive experience to address the specific challenges faced by institutions and organizations in these fields.

Michael regularly partners with clients to establish positive employee relations. In labor relations matters, he negotiates collective bargaining agreements on behalf of organized clients, represents clients in labor arbitrations and National Labor Relations Board proceedings, and counsels clients with respect to rights and obligations under collective bargaining agreements and applicable labor and employment laws. He also has extensive experience in advising organizations responding to corporate campaigns and negotiating neutrality agreements.

Michael’s privacy and data security practice focuses on advising clients on complying with HIPAA and other state and federal privacy and data security laws. He reviews and develops policies and procedures, written information security plans and integrated compliance programs to ensure his clients meet their obligations under privacy and data security laws. Michael represents clients in investigations of alleged data breaches and advises them on reporting obligations.. He also conducts workplace training programs on HIPAA compliance and related privacy and data security topics.