The Social Media Manager/Guru/Wizard/Ninja/Diva

Have you hired a social media manager?  A social media guru/wizard/ninja/diva?  Each of these job "titles" are increasingly being used by companies to attract individuals who specialize in marketing a company's brand and/or services in social media.  A recent article in the Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times highlights just how prevalent these job titles are becoming corporate America.  

As companies struggle to keep up with the rapidly evolving world of social media, they are turning to hiring to hiring social media managers to handle their social media presence.  However, companies should be leery of the “jump first, look second” approach.  In fact, several key questions should be asked when delving into the realm of social media and hiring a new, typically younger employee with responsibility for a company’s social media existence and, therefore, its brand

Qualifications:

  • What qualifications are you looking for?  Often companies seek a younger employee who is "tech-savy."  Traditional employment issues notwithstanding (i.e. age discrimination when an "older" employee is not hired/considered for a position), companies must also consider what their social media mission/focus will be.  For example, to the extent a company utilizes social media as a marketing tool, will you want your social media manager to have a background in marketing?  Similarly, to the extent you wish to utilize social media to handle client/customer complaints, will you want your social media manager to have a background in customer relations? Will you hire an external candidate who is perhaps unfamiliar with your company and its mission, or will you hire an internal candidate?

Responsibilities:

  • What products/services will the social media manager be responsible for discussing/marketing?
  • Will the social media manager have total freedom to explore and execute social media opportunities? 
  • What policies will the social media manager be responsible for implementing?  Will the social media manager have responsibility for implementing the company's social media policy to employees and managers as well?

Training/Protocols

  • What training will be provided to your social media manager?  For example, will the social media manager be trained on what information he/she should or should not consider when examining posts by customers and/or employees? 
  • What policies will govern your social media manager’s employment?  Will the social media manager be permitted to “friend” employees/subordinates on social media or establish policies for employees to follow? 
  • What safety protocols will be in place?  For example, if your company has a Facebook page, will you social media manager be responsible for maintaining the password and access to same?  How will the company transition its social media presence if and when the social media manager separates from employment? 

While the above list is by no means exhaustive, it demonstrates some of the additional considerations that must be examined when a company wishes to expand into social media.   Companies are often unaware of the need to consider these questions prior to implementing a social media policy or hiring a social media manager.  However, examining these points will help ensure your company’s social media experience flows more smoothly. 

Federal Contractors Required to Conduct Privacy Training Under Proposed Regulations

A Federal Acquisition Regulation proposed on October 14, 2011 (76 Fed. Reg. 63896, 10/14/11), would require federal contractors to conduct privacy training before being given access to government records or handling personally identifiable information. For many entities, training may already be called for under a federal or state law, or contract provision. However, this regulation raises the bar by effectively halting a contractor's work until the training is performed. Contractors will need to watch this regulation closely as it may affect their businesses. The public may submit comments on this regulation until Dec. 13, 2011.

Key features of the proposed regulations:

  • Contractors would be required to provide initial training and annual training for employees who either —(1) require access to a government system of records; (2) Handle personally identifiable information; or (3) Design, develop, maintain, or operate a system of records on behalf of the federal government.
  • Federal agencies are required to provide contractors the training materials unless, on
    an exception basis, the contracting officer authorizes a contractor to provide its own privacy training materials.
  • The contractor is responsible to ensure the training is completed, and must maintain documentation of the training.
  • Certain privacy clauses will need to be added to the contract between the contractor and  the government.

Training must cover at least the following seven areas:

  1. The protection of privacy, in accordance with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a);
  2. The handling and safeguarding of personally identifiable information;
  3. The authorized and official use of government system of records;
  4. Restrictions on the use of personally-owned equipment to process, access, or store personally identifiable information;
  5. The prohibition against access by unauthorized users, and unauthorized use by authorized users, of personally identifiable information or systems of records on behalf of the Federal
    Government;
  6. Breach notification procedures i.e., procedures for notifying appropriate individuals when privacy information is lost, stolen, or compromised) and
  7. Any agency-specific privacy training requirements.

Blue Cross Blue Shield Data Breach Highlights Need for Employee Training/Awareness

Today, Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced his office will investigate a data breach that occurred in late August that affected approximately 18,817 Connecticut health care professionals. The American Medical Association reported earlier that this breach involved the personal information, including Social Security numbers, of an estimated 850,000 physicians nationwide. What is most troubling about this breach is that it probably was avoidable.

Like many data breaches, this one involved a stolen laptop, in this case from the employee’s car. However, as NewsTimes.com reported, despite the employer’s encryption policy, the employee downloaded the file to a laptop, without the required encryption, in order to work from home.

Even the best firewalls and other technology-based information system protections cannot save us from ourselves. It was possible here that not only did the employee violate the company’s encryption policy, but he or she also may have exercised poor judgment in leaving the laptop in a car. The ease with which employees acquire, handle and transport massive amounts of sensitive personal information make it critical that businesses ensure their employees have greater awareness of the sensitivity of this information and receive regular training about how to be more cautious handling it. This should be a part of any written information security plan. 

Data Breach Due to Peer-to-Peer Software Reveals Numerous Congressional Ethics Inquiries

The Washington Post is reporting another inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information involving "peer-to-peer" or "P2P" technology. This time, the disclosure exposed a House Ethics Committee document outlining ongoing ethics investigations for an uncomfortably large number of House members. The same technology raises serious issues for employers.

According to the Washington Post, the now-terminated, junior committee staff member saved a copy of the document summarizing the ethics investigations to her personal computer where her peer-to-peer file-sharing software allowed it to be shared.

Besides the difficult political questions that are sure to follow, this incident makes clear that strong data security requires more than a strong firewall and encryption. Administrative policies, training and vigilance are essential, particularly where working remotely and from home is the norm.